Jews Gouge White Benedict Arnold; Flaunt Jew Haym Salomon.

I wanted to research “Benedict Arnold” supposedly the worse White traitor to America, only to find out that the instigator behind Benedict Arnold were “Jews,” the “Franks.”   It’s just “another” example of Jews behind White men, and ruining us beyond repair.   Note the White man is not only punished, but punished for eternity, and the Jewish man’s crime is hidden forever, to make sure that we love, honor, worship and respect the hideous Jew, and degrade our own White men.  It is time to turn those tables and “love, honor, worship and respect the White man,” and to “degrade” the Jew.   I’ll just take the highlights of the PDF book entitled:  Benedict Arnold and Jewish Aid in Shady Deal and make it like “Cliff Notes,” for easy reading.  I believe this is from Henry Ford’s International Jew.
The article talks of Benedict the White man Arnold, was in “Canada”  and there he met David Solesbury Franks, the “Jew of Montreal and a British Subject.”   “There was another David Franks, of Philadelplhia, a member of the same Jewish family and of the same Jewish syndicate of army-contractors.”  
David Franks comes into the scene in 1775, the same year Benedict Arnold marched into Canada, where he was sending back a bunch of Canadian prisoners.    A committee of the Continental Congress has David Franks feeding and caring for these British prisoners and is allowed to “sell his bills for as much money as may be necessary for the purpose.”
Of course, in accepting this proposal, Franks was not only pursuing the course for  he and his numerous relatives had come to America.  He was really doing business with and for Moses Franks, the head of the family syndicate in London.“   Franks was allowed to go to New York, (British Headquarters) but “not to give any intelligence to the enemy,” and then go back to Philadelphia.    Franks got in trouble, 6 months before Arnold took command of Philadelphia.  A letter of his was intercepted on its way to England. It was intended for Moses Franks, and “was concealed under cover of a letter to a captain in a regiment commanded by a British general who married Franks’ sister.  
“It appears on the record of the American Congress ‘that the contents of the letter manifest a disposition and intentions inimical to the safety and liberty of the United States.”   Franks was arrested. Arnold now meets with another member of the Franks’ family, whose name was to be closely associated with the great treason.   “And now begins a serpentine course of twistings and turnings  which are so delightfully Jewish as to be worth restating if only to show how true the race remains to its character through the centuries.”   Although Franks is in prison, somehow with some strange reasoning, it is found that the US has no jurisdiction over the charge of treason (!) and Franks is handed over to the “Supreme” Executive Council of the state of Pennsylvania.  Also, there, they have no jurisdiction.  In spite of the letters and findings of the Congressional Committee, DAVID FRANKS SMILES PLEASANTLY AND GOES FREE!  It was a time when much money was lent by Jews to public officials.  The Polish Jew Haym Salomon, ***more about him below*** was credited with having most of the “fathers” on his books, but he did not charge them interest nor principal.
He grew immensely wealthy, and in lieu of repayment, received “political favors.”    David Franks, likewise a wealthy man, charged with “TREASON,” HAS HIS CASE TRANSFERRED AND DISMISSED. He got off, as usual, scot-free.   “It is a trick not unknown today.”   Franks asks for his secretary to again go to New York within British Lines.  He appeals to the Council of Pennsylvania, refers him to Congress, says that the “secretary be governed by General Washington’s orders.”
When in New York, the secretary discovers that Franks presence is necessary, and arranges for his master to got to New York.  All Congress had to do was say “Yes,” but this time Congress said, “No.”
Franks mentions simply that he was in Arnold’s military family at West Point until his desertion.  Reference to the first court martial of Arnold, Colonel David Solesbury Franks, was Arnold’s chief witness, and shows them closer than Franks will admit.    There were 8 charges against Arnold, the second: “In having shut up the stores on his arrival in Philadelphia even to prevent officers from purchasing, and for his own benefit, it is alleged and ‘believed,’
From an affidavit by a John Fitzgerald was who an aid de camp to his excellency General Washington, said that he and aid de camp, Major David S. Franks, went to the house of Miss Brackenberry, and stayed there that night.  “and the next morning , major Franks having gone downstairs, the deponent going into the front room of said house…. saw lying in the window two open papers; to the said Major Franks to purchase European and East Indian goods in Philadelphia.   The other paper was for the Jew Franks, Arnold’s aid, to purchase things for the table.  One was signed; the other wasn’t.  The table goods letter was signed, the other wasn’t, so it was ‘taken’ for granted that the first letter was by Arnold.
The charge involved as much the trial of Major Franks as General Arnold.  Again, we see Franks getting Letters of Recommendation from the Board of War.   The entire case stems from the allegation that Arnold intentionally had all the shops shut down, so only ‘he’ could buy up the items, and probably at a low price.   When the judge questions Franks, the Jew, about whether Franks knew of Arnold having given orders to purchase goods, he admits he saw the papers, (simply because John Fitzgerald was there on the scene of the crime when the papers arrived, and Franks couldn’t go near them, cause he was caught red-handed.)   “This testimony, seemingly straightforward in form, is rather damning to the characters of both men involved.  Arnold, upon taking command of Philadelphia, ordered the stores and shops to be closed and no good sold.  He stopped business outright.  It was a most unpopular order, because it prevented the merchants profiting by the new order of things, the return of the Americans.   The Jewish Major on his staff, have an understanding that under cover of the military closing, they will loot the city of its most profitable goods at the enforced low selling prices — for the obvioius purpose of selling at higher prices when the military order was rescinded.    These are undisputed facts.     Both letters were addressed to Jew Franks.
Even Benedict Arnold admitted the order, but he endeavored to show that having exhibited General Washington’s order to him, (Arnold) to command Philadelphia, and would be a sufficient counterman to the order given to Franks to load up on valuable goods.    “General Arnold to Major Franks:  Did you not suppose my showing you the instructions from General Washington to me, previous to your going into the city, a sufficient countermand of the order I had given you to purchase goods?”
“Major Franks.  I did not form any supposition on the subject.”    “This admission that he wrote the order, and no large purchases of goods could be shown, constituted Arnold’s defense.  It requires no keen legal mind to show its weakness.  If the order was countermanded several days before they entered the city, what was it doing in Miss Brackenberry’s house in Philadelphia on the first morning of Arnold’s command and the first morning of the operation of his order to close the stores? And why did Franks come in search of it?  Discarded orders are not thus carried around and preserved.   Probably no purchases were made.
When Col. Fitzgerald walked into the room and saw the papers, and when soon thereafter Major Franks walked into the room and saw “both Col. Fitzgerald and the papers,” there was nothing to do except to call the plan off.  It had become “known”.  Col. Fitzgerald waited in the room to see what became of the papers. He saw the Jew Franks come and get them. (The text actually says “Jew.”) No doubt Franks told Arnold.  The inadvertent visit of Col. Fitzgerald is the key-fact in that phase of the matter.   “It is worth noting at this point that numerous opportunities were given Franks to retire, both before and after the Arnold treason, but he developed into a persistent clamorer after official jobs. (Same today.)   And then Franks revealed the whole secret of his relations with Arnold.  They were in close association in profiteering matters.
Arnold (White man) was to remain a general in the army, and Franks the Jew was to get out of the army, and work with him privately and share the profits.     But this wasn’t a ‘one time deal.’  This Jew was involved in Arnold’s fortunes from the time the two first met in Canada until the day that Arnold betrayed his country.  And “that is the case.”
From the time of their first meeting, their lines run along together–Franks always being relied upon by Arnold as the credible witness extricates him, (Franks) from his scrapes, and Franks usually doing it with a clumsy success.
“There would be no prejudice against him, (Franks) because he was a Jew, it would be solely due to the suspicions concerning him.  Indeed, readers of the ordinary history will never learn that Arnold had “Jews” around him.  There were David Franks, moneyed man and merchant in the city, David Solesbury Franks on Arnold’s staff – and those never even caught the Jewish clue.
“Franks, then, easily gains letters  to permit him to join the French fleet of d’Estaing, within a month after the Philadelphia business. Benedict Arnold conceived the notion that he too should go into the navy, and a month after his appointment of Philadelphia he writes to General Washington suggesting nothing less than that he be given command of the American Navy!!! at precisely the time … Major Franks takes to the water.   “…..being obliged entirely to neglect my private affairs since I have been in the service,” Arnold writes to Gen. Washington, “has induced me to wish to retire from public business, unless an offer,  my friends have mentioned, should be made to me of the command of the navy… I must beg leave to request your sentiments respecting a command in the navy.”     So far as the historians have been able to discover, no one ever proposed such a thing as making Arnold the admiral of the American Navy. But then, the historians did not know David S. Franks.    Charges against Arnold:

  • Permitting an enemy ship to land, and buying a share of her cargo;
  • imposing menial service on soldiers (a charge brought about by an action of Maj. Franks)
  • issuing passes unlawfully- the case in point BEING THAT OF A ‘JEWESS’ WOMAN NAMED ‘LEVY’;
  • the use of army wagons for his private affairs.

Major Franks was privy to the whole matter of the “Charming Nancy” ship and its cargo.  And Franks was chief witness “for” Arnold’s defense.  If it had occurred but once, as at Montreal, that Arnold had been charged with irregularities involving profitable goods; or if it had occurred but once, as at Philadelphia, that Major Franks happened to be the chief available witness, no serious notice could be taken of it.   But time and again Arnold is caught in shady acts involving profitable goods, and time and again the Jewish Major Franks is his accomplice and chief witness.
So the court had Arnold’s best White friend, George Washington reprimand him, (and the Jew slithers away in the distance and goes scot free.)   “I reprimand you for having forgotten that in proportion as you have rendered yourself formidable to our enemies, you should have been guarded and temperate in your deportment toward your fellow-citizens. Exhibit anew those noble qualities which have placed you on the list of our most valued commanders. I will myself furnish you, as far as it may be in my power, with opportunities of regaining the esteem of your country.”  (Washington)   It was a bad day for Benedict Arnold when he got in touch with the Jewish syndicate of army-conspirators.  There was hope for him even yet, if he would cast off the evil spell.
But time pressed, events were culminating; the alien, having gripped him, was about to make the best of the baleful opportunity.  The closing chapter was about to be written in glory or in shame.   (THE DEARBORN INDEPENENT, Issue of 15 October 1921
I came across information about Haym Salomon when I was looking up George Washington.  Salomon was a Jew who fled Poland because of “Religious Persecution.”  I guess that Polish people didn’t take the 900 years of Jewish occupation well all the time.   In the essay, it calls Salomon the “Financial Genius.”
Haym Salomon went back to Poland when the Poles were at war with Russia.  But, Salomon, the Jew, doesn’t ‘stay put’ in Poland, but he ‘travels,’ around Europe, and eventually goes to England.  This would lead me to believe, that the Jews just used Poland as an ‘address,’ for their dirty dealings.
In 1772, New York was about 14,000 souls, and Salomon, the Jew, became a broker, and the colonists were revolting because of “taxation without representation.”    Haym Solomon was arrested with the other “Sons of Liberty.”   While imprisoned by the British, he let the British know he could speak “German,” and therefore was treated better than the rest as far as food and housing in prison.
Now here is from the article verbetim:
During this time Salomon became a member of the American espionage ring. They operated in such secrecy that even today we know little of their activities. It appears that Salomon was responsible for encouraging more then 500 Hessian solders to desert to the American side! The British paroled him, not knowing of his other activities. Two years later, he was again arrested, and this time taken to a prison called “Congress Hill”. On August 11th, 1778, he was convicted of several capitol charges, all relating to his activities as a spy. He was sentenced to be hanged by the neck until dead, the next morning. He was returned to his cell to await his fate. 
Haym Salomon had planned on this eventuality and had hidden some gold coins in his clothes. With them he bribed a guard, escaped and made his way to Philadelphia and safety.
In Philadelphia he reestablished hi s brokerage business from a coffee house and became known as a knowledgeable broker. 
But Washington’s war chest was completely empty, as was that of Congress. Washington determined that he needed at least $20,000 to finance the campaign. When Morris told him there were no funds and no credit available, Washington gave him a simple but eloquent order: “Send for Haym Salomon”. Haym again came through, and the $20,000 was raised. Washington conducted the Yorktown campaign,  proved to be the final battle of the Revolution, thanks to Haym Salomon.
The Treaty of Paris was signed on September 3rd, 1783, and ended the Revolutionary War, but the financial problems of the newly established Country were not. It was Haym Salomon who managed, time-after-time, to raise the money to bailout the debt ridden government. 
But, I found more about him, that isn’t written here by the Jews, and it will tell you “how” exactly Salomon got his money.
Now here is from that has a complete library of Jewish information. (Jewwatch shut down as are most of the major pro-White / Jew exposing websites.
It is called “Haym Salomon,” the rest of the story.
Well, I came across an article a few days ago, about a Jew in Canada’s early days that would manufacture and sell “cheap rum” and trade it for the “best foods of the Canadian valley.”
One person ‘did’ have it on his website was James Von Brunn, but the government “deleted” his words.  Can you imagine the few of us that write to promote, protect, our White Race, and one by one they are “deleted,” “arrested,” but above all “punished.”
Well, I did find it, and it was on the Benedict Arnold series of articles I read other than the one I quoted above:
Benedict Arnold: A Traitor in our Midst, by Barry Wilson.
As I search for this specific passage, I come across a book, “Jews in Canada,” and it talks of David Franks the Jew above was Benedict Arnold’s chief defense witness in his trial, and it says that David Franks, the Jew, was wealthy.  But, it also says that America “kicked him out of the country,” for being an ally with the British, our enemy.  Not only did they kick him out, but they confiscated all his wealth.    He apparently was given “large grants of land and real estate by the British Government.”
Another Jew, Ezekiel Hart, in Canada that won a political seat “refused” to take his oath “on the true faith of a Christian.”
He was kicked out of his seat, several times, but kept fighting, and kept fighting to get it back.
From the book:
“…… heavy majority in May 1808, but again the
House refused to let him take his seat; and, after some exciting
scenes, a bill was pushed through to its second reading
“to disqualify Jews from being eligible to a seat in
the House of Assembly.” This aroused the indignation
of Sir James Craig, then Governor, angrily dissolved
the House before the bill could pass.
Diary of Anne Frank a Fraud: Jew monopolized published in 80 languages. Jews must constantly keep their lies up or their empire is over. Joe Rizoli:
In her own words describing herself (lesbian, drugged up and… ·  Here is Anne in her own words questioning her own personality: “Am I then really so bad-mannered, cocky, headstrong, pushy, stupid, lazy etc. etc. as they above say?” It describes a typical Jewess. Are Whites and other races are teaching their children to be bad-mannered, cocky, headstrong, pushy, stupid, lazy etc. etc

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *